This website is under continuing development. We welcome your feedback.

EPR Reference Database

Publication type: Report

Evaluation of extended producer responsibility for consumer packaging

Abstract/summary

Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a policy approach that shifts the cost of managing post-use products, either partially or fully, from local governments to the producers of those products; some EPR laws require producers to physically manage their products at end-of-life as well. This report only uses the term EPR to refer to government laws or regulations that require producers to take on some measure of responsibility for their packaging materials or products at end-of-life. There is increasing debate in North America whether extended producer responsibility policies should be expanded to assist in progressing toward environmental objectives for products, packaging, and printed paper. There are 63 existing legislated EPR laws/programs in U.S. states. All, except for one, of these existing laws apply to products with hazardous components, including products such as batteries, electronics, mercury containing devices, household hazardous wastes.1 None currently applies to packaging and printed paper. Globally, however, packaging and printed paper EPR programs exist in over 35 non-U.S. locations including a few Canadian provinces, most European countries, and a couple of Asian countries. Because waste management is considered a local and state/provincial responsibility in the United States and Canada, there are no nationallevel EPR laws in either country and EPR decisions are made by individual states or provinces. The purpose of this project was to evaluate whether legislated EPR policies are a preferred approach for meeting environmental objectives for consumer packaging in the United States. Because there are differences of opinion over the relative importance of differing environmental objectives and the extent to which cost should be considered in achieving them, it is expected that this report will better inform but not end the discussion over packaging EPR. Also, this report focuses on packaging and printed paper, and does not evaluate whether EPR may be appropriate for those products, mostly with hazardous components, that are more common targets for EPR.

Read more
Author(s)
Individual author information unavailable
Year
2012
Publisher
Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
Commissioning organization
Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
Authors’ organization
SAIC
Number of pages
68
URL
https://web.archive.org/web/20160808190745/http://www.gmaonline.org/file-manager/Sustainability/GMA_SAIC_EPR_Report_091112.pdf
For explanation of this display of publication information (metadata), see here.

This website provides reference information on reports, articles, and other publications related to EPR. Where possible, links to the original source are provided. Copies of the actual publications are not maintained in the reference database because the publications may be copyrighted or otherwise protected by the publishing source or author. Follow the link to the original document and/or contact the publisher/author for more information.