This website is under continuing development. We welcome your feedback.

EPR Reference Database

Publication type: Report

Filling Gaps in the Policy Package to Decarbonise Production and Use of Materials

Abstract/summary

The time has come to get serious about decarbonising the emission-intensive materials sector. The production of basic materials (cement, iron and steel, paper and board, aluminium and chemicals and petrochemicals) accounted for around 25% of global CO2 emissions in 2014 (Figure 1). As non-OECD countries are developing infrastructure and housing in line with their economic growth, their demand for basic materials is particularly high. This demand accounted for around 80% of carbon intensive materials (by weight) contributing to about 75% of the global emissions from basic materials production. While a portfolio of mitigation options exists to decarbonise the materials sector, progress in their realisation has been rather modest, mainly due to two reasons. However, some of these past barriers to progress may be shifting. Nonetheless, the capital-intensive investments that are needed to move from early phase innovation to commercial scale for decarbonised production processes and products will not take place unless there are sufficient incentives from the surrounding policy framework. However, the current lack of clarity regarding the policy framework and its further evolution results in an investment limbo. Developing the necessary policy framework requires two things: 1. A broadly shared vision of feasible development pathways towards deep decarbonisation of material production and use; 2. Further efforts to identify and fill gaps in the existing policy framework for emissions reductions in the materials sector, to enable industry to more effectively unlock options for a shift to new technologies, processes, and materials. This report explores what could be a suitable policy package to allow the private sector to pursue this journey and to align the political support of constituencies interested in individual mitigation options.

Read more
Author(s)
Karsten Neuhoff
Olga Chiappinelli
Chris Bataille
Manuel Haußner
Roland Ismer
Eugénie Joltreau
Ingmar Jürgens
Carlotta Piantieri
Jörn Richstein
Oliver Sartor
Puja Singhal
Jan Stede
Year
2018
Publisher
Climate Strategies
Commissioning organization
European Climate Foundation Heidelberg Cement Mistra Carbon Exit Energie Campus Nürnberg (EnCN)
Authors’ organization
DIW Berlin Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI), Paris University Erlangen-Nürnberg University Paris-Dauphine
Number of pages
42
URL
https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/CS-DIW_report-designed-2.pdf
For explanation of this display of publication information (metadata), see here.

This website provides reference information on reports, articles, and other publications related to EPR. Where possible, links to the original source are provided. Copies of the actual publications are not maintained in the reference database because the publications may be copyrighted or otherwise protected by the publishing source or author. Follow the link to the original document and/or contact the publisher/author for more information.