Publication type: Academic Journal Article
Rapid wind deployment is generating a growing stream of decommissioned wind turbine blades (WTBs), posing a significant waste challenge within the clean-energy transition. In this context, effective recycling is essential for achieving circular resource utilization; nevertheless, its economic feasibility remains uncertain, as it closely depends on evolving policy frameworks and technological advancements. This study assesses China’s end-of-life management by combining Weibull-based retirement scenarios with a system dynamics model that integrates economic, policy, and technology feedbacks. The study indicates the following results. (1) The cumulative WTB waste could reach 19.5 million tonnes by 2050; policy/technology progress can delay the retirement peak by 5–7 years; (2) Recycling is expected to remain economically unviable until 2026, nevertheless, policy subsidies can temporarily offset this limitation. In the long term, sustainable development requires a dynamic subsidy framework that adjusts to declining cost, increasing recycling rate, and fiscal constraints; (3) Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and quota systems significantly increase short-term recycling rates, surpassing the base value by over 25 %, whereas technology subsidies primarily promote long-term innovation and enhance return on investment. (4) The nonlinear evolution of the system is shaped by three interlinked feedback loops: positive feedback from recycling incentives, negative feedback from policy regulation, and positive feedback from technological advancement. Overall, the findings offer quantitative evidence and policy-relevant insights to inform the development of an effective recycling framework for decommissioned WTBs. In alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 12, the study contributes to China’s low-carbon energy transition, advances circular economy objectives, and facilitates the sustainable expansion of wind energy infrastructure.
This website provides reference information on reports, articles, and other publications related to EPR. Where possible, links to the original source are provided. Copies of the actual publications are not maintained in the reference database because the publications may be copyrighted or otherwise protected by the publishing source or author. Follow the link to the original document and/or contact the publisher/author for more information.